yay backlink update

[mark | r]

www.iosilver.co.uk from 238 to 564 - still no pagerank, and strangeley
googlerankings.com is telling me we've slipped from 491 to 508 :(

mark

[Timbo]

mark | r wrote:
> www.iosilver.co.uk from 238 to 564 - still no pagerank, and
strangeley
> googlerankings.com is telling me we've slipped from 491 to 508 :(
>
> mark

That has been the experience of many from reading various message
boards. Lots more backlinks, dropping in rank.


Tim

[Will.Spencer]

My site which has grown most rapidly in the SERPS and in traffic is
also the one which has suffered worst according to the Google link:
command.

On a similar note, I have a PR6 page which shows only one backlink --
and that one is from a PR3 page.

My unhappy conclusion is that the Google link: command is complete
garbage. :(

[MM]

Will.Spencer wrote:
> My site which has grown most rapidly in the SERPS and in traffic is
> also the one which has suffered worst according to the Google link:
> command.
>
> On a similar note, I have a PR6 page which shows only one backlink --
> and that one is from a PR3 page.
>
> My unhappy conclusion is that the Google link: command is complete
> garbage. :(
>

I'm seeing most (all?) pr3 and below backlinks, but only a sample of the
pr4 and above. It seems like a complete reversal of a few months ago.
Maybe fewer is now better!

[Craig]

Fewer could be better for older sites, but that can't be true for new sites
that only have a few links anyway.

"MM" <norealaddress@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7hlyd.544710$Pl.85854@pd7tw1no...
> Will.Spencer wrote:
>> My site which has grown most rapidly in the SERPS and in traffic is
>> also the one which has suffered worst according to the Google link:
>> command.
>>
>> On a similar note, I have a PR6 page which shows only one backlink --
>> and that one is from a PR3 page.
>>
>> My unhappy conclusion is that the Google link: command is complete
>> garbage. :(
>>
>
> I'm seeing most (all?) pr3 and below backlinks, but only a sample of the
> pr4 and above. It seems like a complete reversal of a few months ago.
> Maybe fewer is now better!