Richard S. Westmoreland
12-26-2004, 04:18 PM
"Wayne..." <w.robson@oneteldsl.net> wrote in message
news:41c02f94@212.67.96.135...
> Normally I lay out all my sites using CSS [browser compatibilty can be a
bit
> of a pain, but ther ya go LOL] I was wondering since the Alg's are
> constantly improving. Does it make any difference whether I use CSS or
> tables for my layout?
> I have a complex interface to a site I need to do and in CSS it'll be a
> nightmare. With tables it'll oinly take a few hours. Obviously I don't
> want to 'waste time' if there is litttle or no discernable differnce.
> Thanks in advance.
I prefer tables formatted with CSS. I tried the css and divs approach
before, but it just didn't seem to flow right once I got past a linear
layout.
Rick
news:41c02f94@212.67.96.135...
> Normally I lay out all my sites using CSS [browser compatibilty can be a
bit
> of a pain, but ther ya go LOL] I was wondering since the Alg's are
> constantly improving. Does it make any difference whether I use CSS or
> tables for my layout?
> I have a complex interface to a site I need to do and in CSS it'll be a
> nightmare. With tables it'll oinly take a few hours. Obviously I don't
> want to 'waste time' if there is litttle or no discernable differnce.
> Thanks in advance.
I prefer tables formatted with CSS. I tried the css and divs approach
before, but it just didn't seem to flow right once I got past a linear
layout.
Rick