PDA

View Full Version : Re: Google not indexing


Paul Burke
12-26-2004, 04:18 PM
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:08:58 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk>
wrote:

>On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:10:16 -0600, Paul Burke
><webmaster@firstpeople.us> wrote:
>
>>On 15 Dec 2004 10:32:08 -0800, "williaj" <jwilliams_2003@yahoo.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>Does anyone know why my site is not being found by google. None of the
>>>backlinks are showing up and there is no cache file.
>>>www.garah.com
>>>
>>>Any help will be appreciatec.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>
>>Hi
>>There is no DTD
>
>This is irrelevant.
I know that, but was highlighting the fact that there is so much wrong
with the site.

>Problem with this page is that it's trying to cram far too much in.
>Break it down into a number of smaller, tighter focussed inter-linked
>sites.
The problem is with session IDs

>Actually there is something odd here and we've seen it before with
>that other guy who sold real estate and had an enormously cluttered
>home page. The actual site itself is not indexed but links to it are.
>I throw this open to the floor.
>
>BB
>
>>You have java in the <head>. that probably doesn't help.
>>The page does not validate at all.
>>Half the images do not load.
>>
>>I have spidered it and it came with this error (just one example):
>>
>>http://www.garah.com/propmgr.php?PHPSESSID=58b1a8091957cca2a3a7e41bc713a922
>>WARNING: Session ID's cause problems with search engines!
>>
>>If you want to see it in total:
>>http://www.1-hit.com/all-in-one/php/tool.search-engine-viewer.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.garah.com%2F
>>
>>HTH
>>plh
>>Paul
>
>--
>www.kruse.co.uk SEO@kruse.demon.co.uk
> home of SEO that's shiny!

Big Bill
12-26-2004, 04:18 PM
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 04:39:54 -0600, Paul Burke
<webmaster@firstpeople.us> wrote:

>On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:08:58 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:10:16 -0600, Paul Burke
>><webmaster@firstpeople.us> wrote:
>>
>>>On 15 Dec 2004 10:32:08 -0800, "williaj" <jwilliams_2003@yahoo.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>Does anyone know why my site is not being found by google. None of the
>>>>backlinks are showing up and there is no cache file.
>>>>www.garah.com
>>>>
>>>>Any help will be appreciatec.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>Hi
>>>There is no DTD
>>
>>This is irrelevant.
>I know that, but was highlighting the fact that there is so much wrong
>with the site.
>
>>Problem with this page is that it's trying to cram far too much in.
>>Break it down into a number of smaller, tighter focussed inter-linked
>>sites.
>The problem is with session IDs

It is? Why?

BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk SEO@kruse.demon.co.uk
home of SEO that's shiny!
--

Colt-45
12-26-2004, 04:18 PM
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:23:06 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk>
wrote:

>On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 04:39:54 -0600, Paul Burke
><webmaster@firstpeople.us> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:08:58 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:10:16 -0600, Paul Burke
>>><webmaster@firstpeople.us> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 15 Dec 2004 10:32:08 -0800, "williaj" <jwilliams_2003@yahoo.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>Does anyone know why my site is not being found by google. None of the
>>>>>backlinks are showing up and there is no cache file.
>>>>>www.garah.com
>>>>>
>>>>>Any help will be appreciatec.
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>Hi
>>>>There is no DTD
>>>
>>>This is irrelevant.
>>I know that, but was highlighting the fact that there is so much wrong
>>with the site.
>>
>>>Problem with this page is that it's trying to cram far too much in.
>>>Break it down into a number of smaller, tighter focussed inter-linked
>>>sites.
>>The problem is with session IDs
>
>It is? Why?

Session IDs or SIDs are only valid for a short time. There's and
expiration time set in the web application or server being used.

Google knows this and will not index/record any link that has a SID
attached to it.

Why? Because the SID will expire and when someone clicks on the link
on Google the page will not exist.

>
>BB
>--
>www.kruse.co.uk SEO@kruse.demon.co.uk
> home of SEO that's shiny!

Colt-45
12-26-2004, 04:18 PM
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 10:18:13 GMT, Colt-45 <colt_45@dontmail.com>
wrote:

Actually, let me correct myself.

Google "may" index those pages but won't display them in regular
searches and won't record any searchable info for those pages.

ANYWAY

The main problem with the page at:
http://www.garah.com/index.php

may be that there's no </head> tag


>
>Session IDs or SIDs are only valid for a short time. There's and
>expiration time set in the web application or server being used.
>
>Google knows this and will not index/record any link that has a SID
>attached to it.
>
>Why? Because the SID will expire and when someone clicks on the link
>on Google the page will not exist.
>

Big Bill
12-26-2004, 04:18 PM
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 10:18:13 GMT, Colt-45 <colt_45@dontmail.com>
wrote:

>On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:23:06 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 04:39:54 -0600, Paul Burke
>><webmaster@firstpeople.us> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:08:58 GMT, Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:10:16 -0600, Paul Burke
>>>><webmaster@firstpeople.us> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 15 Dec 2004 10:32:08 -0800, "williaj" <jwilliams_2003@yahoo.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Does anyone know why my site is not being found by google. None of the
>>>>>>backlinks are showing up and there is no cache file.
>>>>>>www.garah.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Any help will be appreciatec.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>Hi
>>>>>There is no DTD
>>>>
>>>>This is irrelevant.
>>>I know that, but was highlighting the fact that there is so much wrong
>>>with the site.
>>>
>>>>Problem with this page is that it's trying to cram far too much in.
>>>>Break it down into a number of smaller, tighter focussed inter-linked
>>>>sites.
>>>The problem is with session IDs
>>
>>It is? Why?
>
>Session IDs or SIDs are only valid for a short time. There's and
>expiration time set in the web application or server being used.
>
>Google knows this and will not index/record any link that has a SID
>attached to it.
>
>Why? Because the SID will expire and when someone clicks on the link
>on Google the page will not exist.

May one not disguise a session id in an url to make the entire url
appear static? (groan)

BB

--
www.kruse.co.uk SEO@kruse.demon.co.uk
home of SEO that's shiny!
--

Tony
12-26-2004, 04:18 PM
Bill wrote:

> May one not disguise a session id in an url to make the entire url
> appear static? (groan)


You're not going to like this:

http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.session.php

;-)


--
Tony

Big Bill
12-26-2004, 04:18 PM
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:14:13 GMT, Tony <spamkill@nospam.net> wrote:

>Bill wrote:
>
>> May one not disguise a session id in an url to make the entire url
>> appear static? (groan)
>
>
>You're not going to like this:
>
>http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.session.php
>
>;-)

No, I didn't.

BB
--
www.kruse.co.uk SEO@kruse.demon.co.uk
home of SEO that's shiny!
--